2006 Audi A3 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (247 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Because 2006 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (321 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 321 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.6 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |