2006 Audi A3 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A3 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2006 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A3 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 57 L |