2006 Audi A3 vs. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W

To start off, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A3 would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2006 Audi A3. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A3.

Because 2011 SsangYong Chairman W is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 SsangYong Chairman W. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W has automatic transmission and 2006 Audi A3 has manual transmission. 2006 Audi A3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Chairman W will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi A3 2011 SsangYong Chairman W
Make Audi SsangYong
Model A3 Chairman W
Year Released 2006 2011
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3188 cc 4966 cc
Horse Power 247 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 250 km/hour 250 km/hour
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 7-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 5410 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1895 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3270 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.6 L/100km 7.3 L/100km