2006 Audi A3 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 714 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2006 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A3 | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1884 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2550 mm |
