2006 Audi A3 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi RVR. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi RVR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 35 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi RVR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi RVR. (196 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi RVR.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2012 Mitsubishi RVR | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A3 | RVR |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 196 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4295 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |