2006 Audi A4 vs. 1952 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 Maserati A6G. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1952 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A4 | 1952 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Audi | Maserati |
Model | A4 | A6G |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 1954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |