2006 Audi A4 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,984 cc, 2006 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (197 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 992 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A4 (280 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A4 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Audi | Riley |
| Model | A4 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1098 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 25 L |
