2006 Audi A4 vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2006 Audi A4. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2006 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A4. (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A4 | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A4 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 502 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2850 mm |