2006 Audi A4 vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,982 cc, 2006 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (197 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A4 (280 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A4 | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A4 | 132 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1756 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 143 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |