2006 Audi A4 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,981 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (220 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 540 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A4 (300 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi A4 1996 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Audi Chevrolet
Model A4 Tracker
Year Released 2006 1996
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2981 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1770 kg 1230 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2210 mm