2006 Audi A4 vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (162 HP @ 1950 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A4. (225 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A4 | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | A4 | R 391 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 1950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 225 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
