2006 Audi A4 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A4 weights approximately 672 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TS-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A4 (281 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A4 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A4 | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 281 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |
