2006 Audi A4 vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2006 Audi A4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A4 (201 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 446 kg more than 2006 Audi A4.
Because 2000 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A4. (281 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A4 | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A4 | Safari |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2830 mm |