2006 Audi A6 vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (329 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 525 kg more than 2006 Audi A6.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A6 | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Audi | Talbot |
| Model | A6 | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 329 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3160 mm |
