2006 Audi A6 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,130 cc, 2006 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (343 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A6 weights approximately 606 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A6 (243 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A6 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A6 | EJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 2262 cc |
| Horse Power | 343 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 243 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |
