2006 Audi A6 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 605 kg more than 2006 Audi A6.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A6 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3130 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 255 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 95 L |
