2006 Audi A6 vs. 1966 Bizzarrini A3C
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. In terms of performance, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2006 Audi A6. (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A6 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1966 Bizzarrini A3C.
Because 1966 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A6. (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1966 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 1966 Bizzarrini A3C | |
Make | Audi | Bizzarrini |
Model | A6 | A3C |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 361 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2460 mm |