2006 Audi A6 vs. 1980 GAZ 24
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 3,123 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 GAZ 24 has automatic transmission and 2006 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 2006 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 GAZ 24 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A6 | 1980 GAZ 24 | |
| Make | Audi | GAZ |
| Model | A6 | 24 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3123 cc | 2445 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.1 seconds | 22 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
