2006 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. (168 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac Firebird.
Because 1982 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Pontiac Firebird (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A6. (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1982 Pontiac Firebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Audi | Pontiac |
Model | A6 | Firebird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |