2006 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (98 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A6 weights approximately 635 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A6 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (131 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | A6 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |