2006 Audi A6 vs. 1995 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2006 Audi A6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (255 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1995 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Jaguar XJS.
Because 1995 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 1995 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XJS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 255 HP | 222 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 82 L |