2006 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,130 cc, 2006 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (343 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A6 (243 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3130 cc | 2492 cc |
Horse Power | 343 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 243 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |