2006 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A6 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Audi A6. (253 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 396 kg more than 2006 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A6. (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2012 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A6 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 85 L |