2006 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A6 weights approximately 171 kg more than 2013 Ferrari California.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A6. (420 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A6 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Audi | Ferrari |
| Model | A6 | California |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 78 L |
