2006 Audi A8 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2006 Audi A8 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A8 (256 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2006 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A8 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A8 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A8 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3123 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 163 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 94.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 88.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 76 L |