2006 Audi A8 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A8 would be higher. At 3,697 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A8 (276 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 2006 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A8 (360 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A8 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A8 | Epica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3697 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |