2006 Audi Q7 vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2006 Audi Q7 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2006 Audi Q7. (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi Q7.
Because 2006 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi Q7 (500 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Thunderbird. (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi Q7 | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Q7 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 91 L |