2006 Audi Q7 vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2006 Audi Q7 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 3,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi Q7 weights approximately 1299 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 2006 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Audi Q7 has automatic transmission and 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste has manual transmission. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Audi Q7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi Q7 | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | Q7 | Celeste |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3597 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2244 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2350 mm |