2006 Audi Q7 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2006 Audi Q7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 3,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi Q7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi Q7 (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi Q7 weights approximately 339 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi Q7 (360 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi Q7 | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | Q7 | SUW |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3597 cc | 1097 cc |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2244 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 71 L |