2006 Audi Q7 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Audi Q7 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi Q7 (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 30 kg more than 2006 Audi Q7.
Because 2006 Audi Q7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi Q7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi Q7 (500 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Audi Q7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi Q7 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | Q7 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2295 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3510 mm |