2006 Audi RS4 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2006 Audi RS4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi RS4 (414 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2006 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi RS4 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | RS4 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |
