2006 Audi RS4 vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS
To start off, 2006 Audi RS4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Audi RS4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi RS4 (414 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Because 2006 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi RS4 (430 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi RS4 | 1963 NSU 1000 LS | |
Make | Audi | NSU |
Model | RS4 | 1000 LS |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 42 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 430 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.5 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 66.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 34 L |