2006 Audi S3 vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S3 (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S3 | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | S3 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1030 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2060 mm |