2006 Audi S3 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 710 kg more than 2006 Audi S3.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S3 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | S3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |
