2006 Audi S3 vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80

To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1967 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1967 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 NSU Ro 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S3 (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 NSU Ro 80. 1967 NSU Ro 80 has automatic transmission and 2006 Audi S3 has manual transmission. 2006 Audi S3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1967 NSU Ro 80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: