2006 Audi S3 vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (256 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2006 Audi S3. (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi S3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 155 kg more than 2006 Audi S3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (491 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi S3. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S3 | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S3 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 491 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |