2006 Audi S3 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 608 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S3 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | S3 | 9 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 243 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 822 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 38 L |
