2006 Audi S3 vs. 1983 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1983 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Zastava 2101. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S3 (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S3 | 1983 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | S3 | 2101 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2430 mm |