2006 Audi S3 vs. 1984 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Talbot 1510 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1984 Talbot 1510. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Talbot 1510. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 350 kg more than 1984 Talbot 1510. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Talbot 1510. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S3 (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Talbot 1510. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S3 | 1984 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | S3 | 1510 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |