2006 Audi S3 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 895 kg more than 2006 Audi S3.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi S3. (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi S3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S3 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |