2006 Audi S3 vs. 2002 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2006 Audi S3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi S3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S3 (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S3 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi S3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S3 (280 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo. (145 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S3 | 2002 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Audi | Daewoo |
| Model | S3 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 222 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
