2006 Audi S4 vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 2006 Audi S4 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Audi S4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S4 (340 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1984 Lotus Etna. (331 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S4 should accelerate faster than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S4 (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Lotus Etna. (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S4 | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | S4 | Etna |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 331 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |