2006 Audi S4 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi S4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi S4 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S4 (410 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S4 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Audi | Mini |
| Model | S4 | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |
