2006 Audi S6 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2006 Audi S6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 569 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S6 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | S6 | EJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5204 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 420 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 732 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
