2006 Audi S6 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Audi S6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 367 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 648 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S6 | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | S6 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1540 mm |