2006 Audi S6 vs. 1981 Zastava 2101
To start off, 2006 Audi S6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 2101.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 2101. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 645 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 2101. 2006 Audi S6 has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Audi S6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S6 | 1981 Zastava 2101 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | S6 | 2101 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 87 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |