2006 Audi S6 vs. 1982 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2006 Audi S6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 358 more horse power than 1982 Ford Taunus. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Taunus.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 634 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Taunus. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Taunus. 2006 Audi S6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Ford Taunus has manual transmission. 1982 Ford Taunus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Audi S6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S6 | 1982 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S6 | Taunus |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1710 mm |