2006 Audi S6 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi S6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi S6 would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Audi S6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi S6 (420 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (222 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Because 2006 Audi S6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi S6 (732 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford E-Series. (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Audi S6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi S6 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | S6 | E-Series |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5204 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 420 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 732 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.5:1 | 9.38:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 25 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2017 mm |