2006 Audi TT vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 64 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (221 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1942 Cadillac 60. (148 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1942 Cadillac 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 540 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 1942 Cadillac 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Cadillac 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | TT | 60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3230 mm |