2006 Audi TT vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2006 Audi TT.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi TT (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | TT | 40 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3194 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.9 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3090 mm |